Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - aschendel

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14
16
General Banter / Re: Why I ride Adventure-Tour Bike
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:48:49 PM »
Do they really?  Slick mud is what I'm most worried about up on the "roads" way up north...

now that i can get KTC-80's in the right size, i plan to make it to the top of the world on my ninja...

a.s.

As long as it doesn't rain. They suck in the wet.

17
General Banter / Re: Why I ride Adventure-Tour Bike
« on: September 04, 2012, 12:47:22 PM »
I must have interpreted the article wrong, he said he prefers a smaller lighter bike most of the time and likened big ADV bikes to SUVs, i.e., good for some.

Anyhow, I do think that ADV bikes are interesting even heavy, breakable and expensive as they are, and I love reading the stories some people find on them as the ADV folks appear quite willing to type / share at a commitment level not many other groups seem to attain.

I'm not ready to compromise (at least that's what I'll call it) yet.  I can ride a sportbike on gravel well enough to get to my own stories/memories, and I've always made it back thus far...  Stuck up to the fairings once in the mud, by myself, that sucked pretty bad, but polished off the final 850 miles of my SS1000 once some strangers got me out.

I was looking for details about your next ride, are they posted somewhere?

Thanks,

Andy

18
General Banter / Re: Why I ride Adventure-Tour Bike
« on: September 04, 2012, 09:24:44 AM »
now that i can get KTC-80's in the right size, i plan to make it to the top of the world on my ninja...

a.s.

19
General Banter / Re: Earphones
« on: July 12, 2012, 10:20:51 PM »
did you try the other tips?  i switched immediately to the grey rubber ones...  i'll take them if you really end up not liking them.  and i agree, ears are a very sensitive body part.

a.s.

20
General Banter / Re: Crashes Reported in the Media
« on: June 29, 2012, 02:10:43 PM »
Those are preliminary filings of an incident from the MNDPS/State Patrol. website.  You generally will not find much detailed witness or first hand statements in these filings.

But they do report the road conditions at the time of the crash, whether other vehicles are involved, helmet use and time of day.  I find that information interesting, but then I'm sort of a mundane details geek anyway.  You generally won't find anything that might wind up being in a court case or insurance report.  Dave offered up a rare first person account of his crash on the web, but you generally won't run into that often.

I find it interesting that Dave's accident doesn't actually involve the type of motorcycle listed and certainly "failed to negotiate corner" in his case is a far cry from what I would imagine happened based on that description.  I'm pointing that out because we were pretty harsh on that group of bikes that fell down on the exit ramp with passengers using this same preliminary (inadequate?) data from the MNDPS/State Patrol website.  I believe his situation is a clear indication that we'd be foolish (in my opinion) to assess/judge/critique (dare I say "learn"?) from these reports.  I'm glad you post them (and other stories), I was surprised to find out how mistake-prone my assumptions were in this case.

a.s.

21
General Banter / Re: Crashes Reported in the Media
« on: June 29, 2012, 10:58:06 AM »
Wow, interesting story that also really shows me that what is posted from wherever PKPK is getting it doesn't really give me anything with which to assess the situations being "reported"!

a.s.

22
General Banter / Re: Curt Gran (CrazyKZ) - 6/17/2012
« on: June 23, 2012, 09:40:34 AM »
I'm planning on going (down and back on Saturday), there are a few people from the ST-Owners group going down from here as well we could try to meet up with.  I get the sense (just from an email) that they might "straight-line" it down there and I'd prefer to leave earlier and wind my way down, although I'm quite open to different options, especially if the weather isn't good.  I was kinda thinking of this google map route, I checked it yesterday via the satellite view and I am pretty sure it's all paved.

a.s.

23
General Banter / Re: Curt Gran (CrazyKZ) - 6/17/2012
« on: June 20, 2012, 01:33:45 PM »
From here: http://www.st-owners.com/forums/showthread.php?117924-CrazyKZ-(Curt-Gran)-6-16-2012&p=1485716&viewfull=1#post1485716

The service will be held Saturday, June 30 at St. Paul's Lutheran Church in LaCrosse at 11 AM. The address is 420 West Avenue South. This will be followed by a light lunch at the LaCrosse Center. Address is 300 Harborview Plaza in LaCrosse.

Anyone thinking of heading down?  I might...

a.s.

24
I took a few more pics of my setup today and typed up a little blurp for another forum, figured I could cross-post it here.  Sorry my stuff's so dirty, it sat in the rain yesterday...

I would like my power outlet not keyed is just an annoyance about how my GPS works, especially when powered from a USB adapter...  Like most (all?) GPS', it prompts to shut itself off when the power is removed.  At gas stops, etc, when powered by a USB adapter, even if I remember to keep it on, it redetects the USB and tries to go into computer-connected mode which is annoying since it takes awhile to get back to normal.  I think I could get a specific USB charging cable, and of course it doesn't do this when using the Garmin car adapter.  So when I'm using the Garmin cord I just have to remember to click "Stay On" or I have to wait for it to boot back up...  thankfully this unit starts up quickly so it's not a huge problem.  Here are some pics (if you get a Red-X, right-click and choose show picture, my image host can't handle too many connections at one time):

















The location is my favorite part.  Aside from the fact that it blocks my trip meter (no gas gauge :( ), having a map right near my line of sight, where I'm used to looking, lit up in the dark, etc. is fantastic.  And I rode in the rain at DCTC with it (in a ziplock bag) and it didn't get even a drop of water on it.

25
It's plenty for me (seldom shift out of sixth when going through small towns @ 30mph) and I've been happy with it for 55k miles, but you'd have to compare it firsthand to see how it feels to you.  Lloyd has the ZZR-600 so he probably knows the specs / feel as well.  From back in that era:

http://www.motorcycle.com/shoot-outs/year-2000-world-supersport-shootout-15648.html

a.s.

26
I'll throw out a vote for my current ride, a 2000-2002 Ninja ZX-6R (and 2005+ (?) as the ZZR-600); highly capable, good range (200 miles on 4.5 gallons), comfortable for the right people, and a great value.

a.s.

27
General Banter / Re: Crashes Reported in the Media
« on: June 13, 2012, 01:46:54 PM »
It sure shows how much rider training is lacking for many riders.  The lady who crashed when the road changed from tar to gravel for example.


Training, in general, has never been shown to be as effective as some seem to think it is.  I read this article the other day:

http://www.me.vt.edu/gabler/publications/TRR-Daniello-2140-2009.pdf

"One common assumption is that trained motorcyclists have fewer
accidents. A review of the literature shows that there is no consensus
for the validity of this assumption."

"Research to date has not consistently supported the notion that
training is either effective or ineffective."

I could write a book about this topic.  I doubt anyone would want to read it, much less pay for it, though.   :-\

Brent


I think that "research" fails to account for 2 things: the overwhelming role that bad luck plays in crashes, and the fact that no situation is directly comparable to any other.  Furthermore, extrapolating from "research" ends up at statistics anyways, and when your number is up the stats don't matter.

2 riders, one trained and one untrained, identically sized, riding alongside one another at the same speed on identical bikes have the road change from pavement to gravel at the exact same time.  The one with training slows quickly and confidently but happens to hit a dip or loose spot in the gravel and falls, while the other, who panics and does nothing doesn't fall.  This leads to incorrect statistics.  "Research indicates that panicking, with no training and no gear is safer!"  The fallen rider, sporting quality gear, dusts himself of and the pair sets off again, shortly thereafter, again, riding side-by-side, they crest a hill and find a large Combine occupying both lanes.  The untrained rider again fails to slow quickly and confidently and this time is impaled unto death.  Their family blames the "research" for the rider's poor choices and before you know it, all Combines are required to come from the factory equipped with straight exhaust pipes, for safety.

a.s.

28
General Banter / Re: Earphones
« on: June 13, 2012, 09:17:44 AM »
i use the ER6i's as well, for riding occasionally, but mostly for when I'm mowing, etc.

a.s.

29
General Banter / Re: Helmet Laws
« on: June 12, 2012, 08:31:44 AM »
Call me back when we have a solution to the "drain on society" that smoking is and we can talk about putting helmets on a few people that aren't smart enough to do it themselves.

Is the "social cost" of smoking as high as the "social cost" of helmetless riders?  The Time article you referenced makes no claim about the cost of smoking, only the death toll.

The few people I know who've died of smoking-related illnesses went pretty quickly, but I have two friends from childhood who will never live  independently because of traumatic brain injury.

I don't know the medical costs, specifically, but even dying fast can be costly; and I'm going to bet that of the people dying every six seconds, they're not all covering all of their own expenses.

Anyhow, I'm not sure if you are thinking big picture enough.  Dead people are worthless, for starters.  Kids without parents, parents without parents, employers without employees, etc. etc. etc.  Also I know of people that "can't" pay their child support but can afford to smoke, can't afford their house, can't keep a job, can't do any number of things but somehow make it a priority to smoke.  There are dozens of people where I work that lose hours of productivity each day as they don't have time to do their work but have time to take a smoke break.

<shrug> I'm not anti-freedom to smoke, but the cost seems extraordinarily high to me.

a.s.

30
General Banter / Re: Helmet Laws
« on: June 11, 2012, 10:42:03 PM »
Slant is right :)  I especially like the roadkill paragraph.

At the risk of introducing something tangential, but near and dear to my heart, "5.4 million people die each year — one every six seconds — from lung cancer, heart disease or other illness directly linked to tobacco use. Smoking killed 100 million people in the 20th century, and the yearly death toll could pass 8 million as soon as 2030 — 80% of those deaths will be in the developing world, where tobacco use is growing most rapidly."

Read more: http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1711154,00.html

Call me back when we have a solution to the "drain on society" that smoking is and we can talk about putting helmets on a few people that aren't smart enough to do it themselves.

a.s.

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 14