Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Deplorable, thank you!

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 29
331
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 10:37:21 PM »
 Here is safety thoughts----all 3 of these tires are from forum members bikes and they are all active members as well, fwiw

Tire a)
left side just under 1/32" to the wear bar......center 2+/32" to the wear bar...right side on the wear bar------
Tire b)
it is pretty self explanatory, it should have been removed more 1000 miles ago. What is your life worth kind of scenario, IMO
Tire c)
 well it is under 1/32" to the wear bar in the center (at the cupped areas actually at the wear bar), while both sides have more than 3/32"

Okay so mind you "sport" front tires typically come with 4/32" of tread depth above the wear bar
Also keep in mind the wear bar is the legal limit of what you can ride on at 1/32"
Finally, since this is a safety thread.

I want to know what any of you think of these 3 tires in general.
ie...would you ride it that, is it taken off too soon, do you think it is "safe", riding styles etc....

Tire A specifically. It has over half the tread depth left in the center.
Would you have kept riding on it ?(if you were the person who wore out the edges faster than the center)---if so for how long, I mean how much more wear, not how many more miles.

Tire B specifically. Well besides its obvious lack of any tread whatsoever, and the "ridge" in the "just barely leaned" area. What on earth would you presume to think this person was thinking continueing to ride on this all the way to this point?
Would you have allowed them on a ride you were at, as the organizer or not?
How would you approach your conversation with this person?

Tire C specifically. Well it does have minimal tread, but is cupped pretty bad.
Would you make any suggestions to a person showing up to a ride with this tire?
What do you think caused this condition?
If it was your bike, would you continue to ride on it?
Would you suggest they not join the ride?

332
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 02:24:28 PM »
"I can definitely identify with Lloyd's sentiment around closing down the forum and rides to "outsiders" as I recognize that it introduces many who are not and will not ever be a good fit for MN-MSTA. "

Is that what I said?
I guess I 'll have to go back re-read (but I do like the forum viewed to logged in members only-perhaps that was the context)

I am all for individuals bringing people that they already know will likely (high probablity) be a "good fit".

I am very much against trolling for whatever bites the line, and then a real em in and we'll see approach. Which is how I percieve the last 2+ seasons have gone.

Also, yes those that "don't fit", "don't contribute" then why are they here? I mean really why are about 200 "members" in name only actually on this forum? For the most part they don't post, don't join rides, don't contribute. Sure there will be "new" members who don't fit on occassion and they will go away or pushed away, sure without a broad sweep net you may miss a few that would be a "good fit", but When I view the memebers list, it is what about 65 that post , perhaps 40 of those that contribute and ride-the rest are just a name....

It would be one thing if you wanted a huge forum name database so you could brag about how your forum is the biggest, or you were trying to sell ad space or something with your ego and/or pocketbook in mind like the other forums do--it is another when it appears all anyone (the contributors) on this forum wants to do is ride with similarly skilled "adult" riding friends, at what is percieved by some as "fast" and for still others at a more "moderate" pace---I still say the two are only a couple mph's apart, I have been on them both regularly.

Just as dinstinction-When I hear "fast" - that equates to someone braking hard and accelerating hard and likely running triple digit speeds. I have only seen that a scant few times on rides with this forum
When I hear John or Paul talk about how slow or moderate they ride. I laugh, I have ridden with both and it is damn near the same pace, minus only a couple miles per hour and maybe 5-10 mph in the more challenging turns-and they both rider faster in the straights than I typically do...stop to stop-the total time would be about the same, perhaps they would even get their first, and Paul has.

Anyways.........

333
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 12:29:00 PM »
"Riding safely" now tops the charts on the top 10 posted on threads...lol


snip again--"years ago) there would often be finger-pointing posts (not useful suggestions) after a ride complaining about this or that. "
Now they just come in the form of a text message, a pm or an email or they spread it via word of mouth and let the rumor mill get it back to you, or atleast that is what I saw a few times last season.

Yes useful suggestions is a much better approach, and if they are based on real experience within the group even better. IMO

334
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 11:31:36 AM »
"it is one of the conclusions I have had"

hey thanks for pointing out the obvious-------I already made that distinction

But it is not only myself who feels this way-do you want to look at my pm inbox?

Besides there is nothing about that post that is inflammatory or insulting-it is simply fact.

It is no different than saying that I don't belong on ZG or TA, so bite me. Nice dletion there Greg---I'll let mine ride.

335
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 11:06:55 AM »
can I had conclusions, 4-1,000,000

okay I will only add the one---and it is one of the conclusions I have had since this new forum layout and all the "everyone is welcome, come join" crap
Conclusion 4---MN-msta rides are not for everyone and we need to stop trying to be so damn politically correct and want everyone to join ( some, likley very many just shouldn't be on these rides or even on this forum.....I kicked 2 away on one of my introduction rides-they both were boneheads and both crashed to boot) We need to be willing to tell them the hard truth, you;
a) aren't welcome
b) aren't good enough (maybe they can't control their ego, or really are that bad, or needy or whatever)
c) Dont participate or add any value to the forum or the rides, goodbye
d) or whatever the scenario is

Not everyone belongs on this forum, hell about 200+ "members" of the forum aren't even really members-they add nothing and don't show up for rides ever.....Members should contribute to both the forum and the rides. Whether it is their ride, or joining a ride doesn't matter to me....Names to faces and being "known" and contributing in  a positive way.

I remember when I knew ever single name and had ridden with just about everyone on the yahoo format, now you have posters who have never even attempted to join anything-they just post their bullshit to post. (many are just drama seekers that should just stay on those other forums where their crap is appreciated and expected)

Okay maybe that is more than just Conclusion 4)

336
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 28, 2011, 01:27:35 AM »
^ Ray when I got to following behind you when you led towards the end of the Tri-State Boogie you made going "pretty dang quick" look pretty effortlessly actually.  For myself skill level wise, I would put myself somewhere in the middle with 13 years of riding experience, but being able to follow your lines made for a safer "spirited" pace through CR E and some of those other roads that were completely new to me at the time.

Sounds to me like you were just following and hoping and assuming Ray would lead you through. Not actually taking accountability for yourself and "riding your own ride"......Which is what we continually preach not to do.

You're too quick to assume that.  What I am saying is it is nice to follow someone who is experienced on a particular road when at a pace that I am also comfortable with.  Being human, would I have pushed myself too hard if I was in a lead position?  I try not to do that, but I prefer to follow until I know a road well by memory.
I know how "quick" Ray is, and since you were a first time to the roads following him at his pace. That pace was way over your head. I don't care if you been riding 13 years. There is riding and then there is riding. I know people that have ridden 40+ years that dont even understand braking or countersteering or so many other things, yet since they been riding forever they assume they are "good" riders.
I am not saying that is you, but a new road should be proceeded on with some trepedation and serious caution, regardless if you have someone "leading" you through that "knows" the road or not

Look I am not bashing on you in particular ( I am bashing on a percieved notion, that one can follow someone far more experienced on those roads and likely a far better rider just because they are "leading"), I am just making a point-you just happen to put up the post to prove it on.

Believe me it is no assumption on my part, it is fact.


"Also, new riders will most likely feel uncomfortable being out in front, knowing there are seasoned riders behind them. "

yes that has been my experience. Even on my Introductory rides, they get all ants in the pants nervous. I am not sure if it is becasue it is me behind them or just becasue they know they are being watched??

337
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 27, 2011, 09:13:48 PM »
^ Ray when I got to following behind you when you led towards the end of the Tri-State Boogie you made going "pretty dang quick" look pretty effortlessly actually.  For myself skill level wise, I would put myself somewhere in the middle with 13 years of riding experience, but being able to follow your lines made for a safer "spirited" pace through CR E and some of those other roads that were completely new to me at the time.

Sounds to me like you were just following and hoping and assuming Ray would lead you through. Not actually taking accountability for yourself and "riding your own ride"......Which is what we continually preach not to do.

338
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 27, 2011, 09:11:20 PM »
"In fact, TK and I were bringing up the tail on the Cannon Falls ride-out, and while Lloyd was leading and I think said he never broke 100 ... ah, let's just say this was a perfect example of the "catch up" "problem" (trust me, we didn't consider it a problem) that can hinder new riders."

You are talking about 11 west of that first gas stop. Nothing but big sweepers, one of those kinds of roads where I hate riding, but that was an all MN ride...LOL (and no I never approached 100, even on those huge sweepers where triple digits would be extremly easy to run and maintain.)


New riders to the front only works if the "veteran" riders are willing to follow at a pace they don't necessarily want to run and are also willing and able to "teach" if they feel the need (becasue there no doubt would be the need). While I have done several of these rides, that is not the way I run my rides for when I am out to have a fun, enjoyable, relaxing, refreshing day.

339
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 27, 2011, 04:14:51 PM »
Feel free to criticize but wouldn't it be safer for new riders to be in the back of the group where the pace is generally slower?

I know I've heard that suggestion before, but I haven't seen it practiced much.  It's easier to watch newer riders when they're riding near the front of the pack than if they're at the rear.  I've been on group rides where I brought up the rear to watch the stragglers.  I've seen some newer riders do some crazy stuff trying to keep up with the faster riders.

Another reason to put new riders near the front: If someone riding at the rear of the pack has trouble and/or needs help, it takes longer to communicate that fact to everyone who's been riding ahead of them.


But this analogy falls flat when you apply it to any other sport or group activity where different skill levels are present.
How many times would a group of advanced skiers go down a hill behind less advanced skiers? Not many times ....
How many times would advanced scuba divers go diving with less advanced scuba divers? Not many times ....
How many times would Ben want to play ping-pong with me (hehe) when he consistently beats me 15-3? Not many times ....

It's not a bad thing (nor does it "look down" on other participants) to want to participate in a sport or skilled activity with participants of similar skill levels.

"It's not a bad thing (nor does it "look down" on other participants) to want to participate in a sport or skilled activity with participants of similar skill levels. "



Just so I am not misunderstanding.

This is your point here, your argument in this posting?

Because if so, remember the snip of Rays post I quoted like 5 times and the whole parting of the clouds and the sun shining thing...Well hot damn the clouds have all but dissapated now and the sky is looking mighty blue. By Joe I think it is finally coming to light, only 5 pages later......(although I would have phrased it more tactfully...lol)

340
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 27, 2011, 02:28:24 PM »
IMO-NO
the people in the back are playing catch up far too often and often are riding faster than the people in the front.

If they ( less skilled) are in the front they dictate the pace and the better riders can actually observe if they start looking erratic or "beyond their limits" and then they(more skilled riders) are good enough to pass and whooo the pace down, before some off road excursion does.


341
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 27, 2011, 11:25:19 AM »
Here let me copy it yet one more time;

"While I personally enjoy a brisk pace, that's my pace, and shouldn't be construed as what others need to ride to enjoy a ride. I'd love to see more riders riding a variety of paces on rides. I think this would make it easier for folks to fit in and find folks to ride with." quoted from Rays post, but exactly what is being stated and sought after in my opinion!!!"


342
Introductions / Re: Either new ... or ... how the hell ya'all been?!
« on: September 27, 2011, 11:08:58 AM »
Lassie, Timmy's in the well??

"My secret to a happy marriage? Get in enough trouble to be sent to the garage"

Does this work?

343
Introductions / Re: Either new ... or ... how the hell ya'all been?!
« on: September 26, 2011, 10:23:33 PM »
This sunday, Oct 2nd

There is a post in the rides section

344
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 26, 2011, 10:15:06 PM »
 I give up....it is worth no further explanation if you haven't gotten it by now.
This just fuckin reminds me of the idiotic posts about members bashing on me because I did not want to share my routes and somehow a few of you came to the conclusion that it was I that was ramming it down your throats that you had to not share or whatthefuckever, when in actuality it was you all  ramming it down my throats that what,  I had to share and I argued to respect the route makers desires, regardless of if they want to share or not. but no...........forget it it isn't worth my time or aggrevation

345
General Banter / Re: Riding Safely
« on: September 26, 2011, 09:34:40 PM »
 You guys just don't get it.

How am I saying you need to ride how I ride?

Did you not read then re read the re-emphasized post......

Here let me copy it yet one more time;

"While I personally enjoy a brisk pace, that's my pace, and shouldn't be construed as what others need to ride to enjoy a ride. I'd love to see more riders riding a variety of paces on rides. I think this would make it easier for folks to fit in and find folks to ride with." quoted from Rays post, but exactly what is being stated and sought after in my opinion!!!

Come on reading one o one........

Pages: 1 ... 21 22 [23] 24 25 ... 29