"Afton City Council has decided to take a stand against motorcyclists." Geez, why doesn't the writer come right out and provide a disclaimer first, like "I don't like motorcycles, but don't let that get in the way of my objective reporting."
The lead-in grabber kills it for me. "Afton City Council has decided to take a stand against motorcyclists." There is nothing fair and balanced about a sentence like that.
The sentence makes it sound like an "us vs them" mentality and is putting all motorcyclists into one group.
Note that I never disagreed with the content of the article, just the sentence that would preload the reader to think negatively about all motorcyclists.
Quote from: pkpk on May 26, 2012, 09:13:21 AMThe sentence makes it sound like an "us vs them" mentality and is putting all motorcyclists into one group.OK. Now I think I get it. You would have preferred a lead-in sentence like "Afton Council discusses options to deal with motorcycle noise and excessive speeds."Quote from: pkpk on May 26, 2012, 09:13:21 AMNote that I never disagreed with the content of the article, just the sentence that would preload the reader to think negatively about all motorcyclists.Or lead a reader to think negatively about some Afton City Council members.
I'd agree with the other assessments too.This was kind of a perfect storm with multiple failures on both vehicle operators.How often are you going to roll up on a truck mysteriously slowing down with no brake lights/ turn signals in a no passing lane with a passenger at night?And let's throw in some inadequate gear too.And the most innocent of the three participants loses a foot. Bad situation.
OK. Now I think I get it. You would have preferred a lead-in sentence like "Afton Council discusses options to deal with motorcycle noise and excessive speeds."