They sure are selling a lot of them, they must be doing some things right.
and if you still don't believe it, next time we ride together bring your tricked out super bike.
There is not enough drama or passion lately so I'll bite.... So you come onto the forum bashing all of us sportbike riders....My completely non tricked out "superbike" can probably and has probably gone on roads far worse than most of those "adventure tourer" guys ever have taken their bike, plus it will get there and give more pleasure while doing so... That is ok---you go ride your ride and I will continue to ride mine. I don't much care for your "close" passes and then audacity to wave me back as if you cutting me off is my fault anyways.
Personal attack from someone I have never ridden before, but know that caused a few of the regular MN MSTA members to leave this forum???I didn’t know who is “Mister” and it took me a little digging to find out. Now I am not surprised. I am not bashing, I am suggesting and quoted one of the more respected motorcycle writers in the industry to back it up. This is a “ Motorcycle Sport Touring Club” AKA MSTA. Which in such, most club members are into sport touring. Yes, there are the purist that ride bikes like the 916 for miles on (admirable) and on the other end of the spectrum you have the Iron Butt guys whom a lot of them ride Vstroms and GS (which had been around for 30 years now, and has been the number one seller for BMW for years) If you ever been to one of the national MSTA rallies you would see that sport bikes are a minority. I myself owned and still own a sport bike and other than the race track or small sections of roads like 95 from Hanson to Arcadia, I would chose my adventure tour bike almost anywhere else. For me, the current generation sport bike are way more aggressive than I like them to be. The YZFs CBR etc.. from a decade ago would be considered sport touring bikes today. I was skeptical and didn’t understand it for many years myself. Even when my favorite ridding buddy trader his 999 for a multistrada I wasn’t entirely convinced. People who know me here, know I take my riding seriously. Just like when I go to a ride and go over the route before hand and make sure my bike and gear is in perfect working condition, I don’t make bike statements and chose a bike on a whim. I considered a light weight Sport tour bikes such as the Ninja 1000 or a used VFR800 and after over 6000 miles on my current bike in the last few months, I am very happy with my decision. These are not dirt bikes and have no intention of being one. These bikes are intended for long distance riding, on street legal roads (paved or not) do two up in comfort and carry luggage and accessories at ease. Just a few months ago MCNews did a Sport tour comparison and stated that they would have chosen the camera bike, an ADV bike, which was not part of the comparison, as the winner. So come to the MSTA endorsed ride I am putting together next weekend on your sport bike, which is mostly on legal roads in a 70 mile radius of the twin cities. Personally, I wouldn’t have an issue running it on my old school sport bike, but I would definitely be more comfortable with my ADV bike.PS: I am done with this debate and have no intention and time to continue this on my end. Quote from: MISTER on September 03, 2012, 12:11:33 PM There is not enough drama or passion lately so I'll bite.... So you come onto the forum bashing all of us sportbike riders....My completely non tricked out "superbike" can probably and has probably gone on roads far worse than most of those "adventure tourer" guys ever have taken their bike, plus it will get there and give more pleasure while doing so... That is ok---you go ride your ride and I will continue to ride mine. I don't much care for your "close" passes and then audacity to wave me back as if you cutting me off is my fault anyways.
now that i can get KTC-80's in the right size, i plan to make it to the top of the world on my ninja...a.s.