Rant on.As many of you may know, my wife is running for MN House. We just mailed a piece of campaign literature to voters pointing out that her opponent is the least productive legislator in over a decade, having authored or co-authored the fewest number of bills of any full time legislator since 1998.We are being contacted by people who think this is good. People who don't seem to realize that if you want less regulation, you need to create a bill with less regulation in it and get it passed to replace the existing legislation which has too much regulation. If you want lower taxes, you need to create a bill with lower tax rates. If you want to get dead beats off of social assistance you need to write a bill to change the law so dead beats can't abuse social programs. If you want the thousands of things government does poorly to change or you want government to get out of the way new legislation needs to be proposed to change the way government does things and to get government out of the way. No new legislation, things just stay the same.What is really funny is these people seem to be the people who are least happy with government and who want the most change, but they think doing the least is good. If voters don't get the basics on how things get done in government, how the heck can they make decent decisions on who they want in office?Rant off.
Trust me, I work in Social Services for a rather large hospital. I see people come here every single day expecting a handout. I'd love to provide them with a bus ticket among other things....