Tim, This exact subject WAS beaten to death 2 years ago. Seams like you're just picking a fight. If you want to split hairs, sure .... some could argue that picture isn't the most flattering a line. What's your point, to embarrass him?I guess I could take your criticisms more in stride if you were a more active participant in riding.
Also, these threads are the ones where certain sides of long-lived arguments tend to get fired up and eventually turn passionate / un-civil, and I think if we can keep that from happening yet again, that would be great.a.s.
That said- I don't think it sends the best image of what "we" represent on this forum to JOE PUBLIC. Perhaps had his body not been on top the centerline-the picture would be the perfect grab your attention and wow me picture to portray to JOE PUBLIC. So while I take no offense to the picture, I also know the rider, know the road, ride similarly to the portrayed rider and don't view it as some DUMB on a sportbike trying to drag a knee or take "race lines"....but is it the perfect home page picture? NO. Is it a good home page picture? absolutely.And since part of the goal Ray talked about is recruitment and public image, a better question may be; -Does the homepage picture portray the right image to passersby viewing the forum?
That picture is why I chose my signature....
There are very few riders on this forum that could take that line aggressively without major risk. Is that something we want to portray?
My lines, on the street, are dictated by the road conditions and my knowledge of the roads . Will cross the centerline when I have the site line, as it is, in some circumstances, the safest way to navigate a turn.Being dogmatic to the PACE, is, IMHO, a fallacy.
Ok, I was hoping for a more thoughtful answer.
Just trying to spark some conversation, and to quote "Great minds talk about ideas. Average minds talk about events. Small minds talk about people."